And of course sometimes we are going to be wrong. But against the VPIP 28% / PFR 4% I will just fold AJ and get out of his way.Īny kind of exploitative poker is based on making assumptions, that someone is unbalanced in one way or another and then adjust to that inbalance. Against that person I am probably 3-betting AJ for value with intentions to get it in, if he come back over the top. Then I am not going to give them action the same way I would someone, who have been playing VPIP 58% / PFR 34%. That means, they have been doing a ton of limping or cold calling, but now they suddenly raise to 5BB from UTG. But if I have good solid information, then why not use it? Lets say, I have 150 hands on someone, and their VPIP over that sample is 28%, but their PFR is only 4%. Or they are doing it with 8 high to try to steal the pot for cheap.Įven though I always have my HUD running, very few decisions are actually based on the information, it provides. But maybe next time they are doing it with the nuts to induce a raise. Maybe you have seen someone make a very small river bet with second pair and taken a note on it. True but exactly the same is the case with reads gathered in a manual way.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |